Talk:Battle of Fariskur (1250)

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Kurdistan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: African / Medieval / Early Muslim / Crusades This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  African military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600) Crusades task force Crusades Mid‑importance Egypt Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 6, 2012, April 6, 2017, and April 6, 2021.

Samsam, nice work on these crusade articles, but I am wondering if it is necessary to insert Arabic names into the text. Most people probably won't be able to read them anyway (even if they have the right fonts to see the text in the first place!). If we should keep them in, I think it would be better to separate them with brackets, rather than simply insert them in the middle of a sentence. Adam Bishop (talk) 04:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Adam Bishop, how are you i did not see you for a long time. I insert the names in Arabic because the names in English spelled often in different ways ( even sometimes wrong )thus I confirm the name and I think it might be usefull for those who can read Arabic. I understand your point. Let us think what to do. you think if we put arabic names between barkets is ok ? or maybe under notes ? let me know and maybe other people have other suggestion. anyway I wait for your suggestion and of others. Samsam22 (talk) 19:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've separated them with brackets for now, what do you think? Adam Bishop (talk) 01:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I think looks good. thnx Samsam22 (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are cases where text is surrounded by >ref< >/ref< and therefore hidden. I fixed some. Others need to be fixed. Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 01:09, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]