Search results
There is a page named "Talk:Battlegroup 107" on Wikipedia
- Why "former"? In 2011, this Battlegroup will be on standby again. Kromsson (talk) 20:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)...568 bytes (19 words) - 12:49, 11 February 2024
- which mentioned possible withdrawal of the Norwegians from the Nordic Battlegroup since that isn't in the source cited. --Edward Sandstig 11:51, 26 August...13 KB (2,236 words) - 00:56, 17 January 2024
- their own battlegroups. They where and arguably still are incredibly valuable ships and are considered capital ships when in a battlegroup. If Iraq had...72 KB (10,062 words) - 17:38, 18 February 2023
- willing to enter an alliance with the USA and has joined the Nordic Battlegroup would indicate that Irish Neutrality is not the reasson. Another reason...176 KB (24,628 words) - 21:33, 2 March 2023
- the era of the SLR and SMG, references provided should reflect this. 80.1.107.208 (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC) There are many examples of kit that...46 KB (5,842 words) - 19:07, 5 June 2024
- and suitably 'accessiblise' it. First question - where were the five battlegroups of 84 corps reserves originally from, and who destroyed them? Ranger...140 KB (20,946 words) - 22:46, 30 January 2023
- May 2012 (UTC) Is the military section outdated? It says that the EU "battlegroups" can only deploy up to 1,500 personnel but I'd guess there are more than...167 KB (22,913 words) - 10:53, 3 April 2023
- there isn't one. But once you take the wikipedia as your ideological battlegroup, right Newimpartial?, then sources are suddenly not necessary. Also this...574 KB (74,592 words) - 06:25, 9 September 2023