Talk:Beat the Chefs
Beat the Chefs has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 30, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Beat the Chefs article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Beat the Chefs appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 September 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Beat the Chefs/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer:
]- herefor what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (lists):
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (focused):
- a (
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Link to Jeff Henderson?
- Also pipe to The About Groupin the reception section.
- Not sure if these sources are of any use (sorta rehash-y), but here they are: one from the South Florida Business Journal and one from the Las Vegas Sun.
Nicely done with no real issues. On hold for 14 days.
23W 03:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
]
- @talk) 03:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)]
- No prob; take your time. 23W 04:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)]
- @talk) 04:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)]
- Nice, I'll pass this (made one edit; broke the end of the production section into its own paragraph). Re: my nominations, no sweat if you're busy, but if you could review 23W 05:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)]
- @talk) 11:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)]
- @
- Nice, I'll pass this (made one edit; broke the end of the production section into its own paragraph). Re: my nominations, no sweat if you're busy, but if you could review
- @
- No prob; take your time.