Talk:Beat the Chefs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:Beat the Chefs/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:

23W (talk · contribs) 07:19, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

here
for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (
    lists
    )
    :
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (
    focused
    )
    :
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Link to Jeff Henderson?
  • Also pipe to
    The About Group
    in the reception section.
  • Not sure if these sources are of any use (sorta rehash-y), but here they are: one from the
    South Florida Business Journal and one from the Las Vegas Sun
    .

Nicely done with no real issues. On hold for 14 days.

23W 03:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

@
talk) 03:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
No prob; take your time.
23W 04:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
@
talk) 04:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Nice, I'll pass this (made one edit; broke the end of the production section into its own paragraph). Re: my nominations, no sweat if you're busy, but if you could review
23W 05:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
@
talk) 11:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]