Talk:Beautiful Garbage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconWomen in Music
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Written by a fan?

I'd never even heard of Shut Your Mouth before - the single sold pretty poorly, at least in australia (peaked at 88), whilst cherry lips made number 7 and is very well known. The article though makes it sound like Shut Your Mouth is true garbage style along with being the best selling single, and cherry lips is a lesser electro-pop song that was only 'a moderately successful single'. Would only australians get the same interpretation as me? or was the article written by someone biased against the electropop style of cherry lips?

Correct Name? / Requested Move

Is the correct name "beautifulgarbage"? Because the iTunes Music Store uses "Beautiful Garbage" and the Garbage official website does in some places as well. Alex 17:17, August 2, 2005 (UTC)

-In response to this, yes the proper title is "beautifulgarbage", soemtimes spelt "BeautifulGarbage". Any other spelling is in error. Breakinguptheguy

The
Korn (band)).". Since spelling the name "beautifulgarbage" is only a typography difference, I think this article should be moved to "Beautiful Garbage", leaving a redirect at the current location. Within the article we can still spell it "beautifulgarbage", if, indeed, this is the official spelling. HymylyT@C 23:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
I am hereby also posting an official request for this page to be moved, since this matter has not recieved any attention for almost a week. HymylyT@C 19:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Based on evidence from freedb and Gracenote, support this move. Chris cheese whine 04:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that
Wikipedia policy applies here, since this is not a "stylized typography; the title only uses the standard Latin alphabet. The example given in the policy is Korn using a non-Latin character for "R". That being said, their own site calls it "Beautiful Garbage", so Support. -SigPig |SEND - OVER 23:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
"beautifulgarbage" with no space and lower-case letters is an example of stylized typography, as it is rendered in a way other than the norm. See typography. Chris cheese whine 15:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Recury 14:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To me it seems a large majority agrees, possibly even consensus has been reached. I will now move the page. HymylyT@C 21:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page moved. I also changed to Beautiful Garbage within the article as this is how it was spelled on Grabage's official website. HymylyT@C 21:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Garbage-Beautiful-Garbage-197506.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011

Since

Allmusic
}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 10:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Reviews section as per: Template:Infobox_album#Professional_reviews

| Reviews =

Saved for future reference.

File:Shirleyroseland.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Shirleyroseland.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --

talk) 13:26, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is
transcluded from Talk:Beautiful Garbage/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 15:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this over the next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 15:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

here
for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (
    lists
    )    :
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (
    focused
    )    :
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have
    suitable captions
    )    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

  • In general, this looks very good. Citations, stability, NPOV, and breadth of coverage are all good. Images are all fair use, and I think the fair use rationales are appropriate.
  • The "World tour" section has some issues with tense. At time it sounds like you're writing as if the tour is ongoing.
  • "Critical reception" has the same problem in places. ("He adds" rather than "he added," for example.)
  • There are some one-sentence paragraphs in the last section that could probably be combined.
talk) 04:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
I made a few more minor changes, but I think there's nothing else that needs fixing. Great article, I'm happy to promote it. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Beautiful Garbage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Beautiful_Garbage&oldid=1211155106"