Talk:Belly fetish
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111107191849/http://web.missouri.edu/~rouderj/3010/readings/Singh.pdf to http://web.missouri.edu/~rouderj/3010/readings/Singh.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Adjectival form
Does this word have an adjective form of it? --SkyGuy94 (talk) 04:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Terrible article
A prime example of how Wikipedia is degenerating into a magazine. A Miller (talk) 17:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Parts are clearly written from the fetishist's point of view. It isn't neutral at all. I attempted a few improvements but it's still bad. 2A00:23C5:FE0C:2100:6D4F:B591:EFE1:65D1 (talk) 23:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)