Talk:Beyer, Peacock and Company

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

BP v BP/Metrovick Joint Venture

Just wondering if there is a need to have two pages with the same. BP was its own company, whislt the Stockton-on-Tees project was a joint venture with MV - suggesting two separate companies

there is already a page on the MV/BP joint venture Bowesfield_WorksSulzer55 (talk) 09:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What happened in 1966?

Did the company go bust? Was it taken over? What happened to all its assets? Was there an attempt to sell it to another firm? I'd love to know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.167.235 (talk) 12:33, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Class 17 diesel omitted?

Hi, I was just wondering why the Class 17 diesel preserved at the Chinnor and Princes Risborough Railway isn't listed in the preserved diesels section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Resinguy (talkcontribs) 00:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beyer, Peacock and Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beyer, Peacock and Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Massively inaccurate

I suspect this was written by some know-it-all railway enthusiasts who didn't feel the need to check facts. Beyer Peacock stayed in profitable business long after 1966, even though it had stopped making locomotives. A Saudi Arabian company bought it in 1976. 218.250.45.167 (talk) 03:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]