Talk:BioJava

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Interface (computing)#Software interfaces in object-oriented languages|interface]] The anchor (#Software interfaces in object-oriented languages) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Couple of Links

here a couple of links for BioJava:

BioJava is an active open source project that has been developed over more than 10 years and by more than 50 developers:

http://www.ohloh.net/p/biojava

In 2010 and 2011 BioJava was sponsored by Google as part of the Google Summer of Code:

http://www.genomeweb.com/informatics/obf-participation-gsoc-2010-bears-fruit-open-source-expectations-high-2011

BioJava currently has about 80 citations in Google Scholar, which demonstrates that is widely used as a library.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=3048631375755320177&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en

--Andreas (talk) 06:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Has anybody made a biological discovery using this library?

There are multiple references about using BioJava in "projects", but all these projects are just about building even more fancy bioinformatical tools. We would highly benefit from the reference that somebody has been discovered using BioJava as part of the research process. I mean, new a gene, a new fragment of some metabolic or regulatory pathway, a regulatory sequence, anything that was later published because of its biological (not informatical) scientific novelty? Is it possible to get such a reference or maybe there are no any? Audriusa (talk) 18:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on BioJava. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on BioJava. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130109110621/http://www.biojava.org/docs/api1.8.2/ to http://www.biojava.org/docs/api1.8.2/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130109110621/http://www.biojava.org/docs/api1.8.2/ to http://www.biojava.org/docs/api1.8.2/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.charite.de/bioinf/strap/Scripting.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208145541/http://www.dengueinfo.org/ to http://www.dengueinfo.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]