Talk:Bishop of Wakefield

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anglicanism Low‑importance Bishop of Wakefield is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Yorkshire Mid‑importance Bishop of Wakefield is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

There are forty-four diocesan

Whether or not a bishop sits in the House or Lords does not have relevance to use of the title 'Lord Bishop'. A bishop has the status of a Lord by virtue of their office of bishop, not by their being Lords Spiritual. This is the same for members of the peerage, who may be lords even though they do not sit in the House. There is no evidence for this modern practice or reserving Lord for either diocesans or bishops in the Lords. There is, however, plenty of evidence of the use of Lord for any bishop, and the Church of England and Crockfords concur that a bishop in possession of a See may be styled Lord Bishop. --Dodgerjammy (talk) 10:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bishop of Wakefield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130708223220/http://www.riponcathedral.info/news.php?passnews=169 to http://www.riponcathedral.info/news.php?passnews=169

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]