Talk:Blue-water navy

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Russian Navy#Deployments and increase in activity|Russian naval activity]] The anchor (#Deployments and increase in activity) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

It seems that Turkey according with the world Hierarchy of Todd and Lindberg list isn't even a green-water navy. But since Wikipedia Is a bad source then I think is ok that someone add its prefer countries in the World Hierarchy of Todd and Lindberg. Thanks --LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 19:56, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

wolf 20:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

It looks like people have been updating the table of navies by capability level according to their own views about the navies' capabilities, without sources for how to rank them. If I understand wikipedia conventions correctly, this is original research that does not belong on wikipedia. I've changed the table to match the book given as a source. It's an old source, and it might be reasonable to try to update it (I'd guess that it probably is more reasonable to call China's navy rank 3 rather than rank 4 now), but we need a source rather than editors' opinions. Unseemly Levity (talk) 04:19, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you look a the previous post, as well as posts in the archives, you will need multiple comments about Todd & Lindberg being used as a source. -

wolf 04:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

What Todd & Lindberg ref from 2019 were you referring to in the previous section? The only Todd & Lindberg reference mentioned in the article or talk page is from 1996. I don't see anything else in the archives about a more recent Todd & Lindberg source. Unseemly Levity (talk) 05:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

Thewolfchild: (I neglected to ping you in my previous reply.) Unseemly Levity (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

It's been awhile now, I don't recall the circumstances of that comment from back then. Instead of hunting through the page history and various refs, I should, and now have, taken it on

wolf 08:44, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• TCG Anadolu sea trials 7 March 2022.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]