Talk:Blue (Joni Mitchell album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Canada: Music Mid‑importance

	the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Women in Music High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Too short

Does anyone else think that for an album as significant as this that the summary is way too short? —The preceding

unsigned comment was added by Hautbois (talk • contribs) 18:11, 24 April 2005 (UTC)[reply

]

I agree, this article is too short. Would David Yaffe's 2017 biography "Reckless Daughter" be a useful source for this? SillimanJ (talk) 01:52, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Richard

In 'The Last Time I Saw Richard'? Or his he just a metaphor for lost dreams? 81.145.240.139 23:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"The Last Time I Saw Richard" suggests that it was, in fact, her first husband Chuck. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History section hardly contains any references

Large parts (actually I should the vast majority) of the History section prose is un-cited. How do we know any of it is true if no secondary sources were cited for the information?

-- J. Wong (talk) 05:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Continuity problem

The History section says that the album was partly inspired by her breakup from James Taylor. It also says that they began their relationship by the summer of 1971. However the album was released in June, 1971 and had been largely completed by March. Either her relationship with Taylor was earlier or none of the songs are about him. We need a source. Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 15:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Blue (Joni Mitchell album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years
, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s) Press [show] to view →
Article requirements:

Y Start: reasonably complete
lead section with overview of album; track listing; reference to at least primary personnel by name; Categorization
by at least artist and year.
Y C: all of start and (1) cover art in infobox; (2) at least one additional section of prose; (3) track lengths & song authors in tracklist; (4) a
personnel section
including all musicians.

B: all of C and (1) most technical details in infobox; (2) technical personnel in personnel section; (3) no obvious issues with
trivia
.

Higher Classes are not assigned by
WikiProject Album. Please review "the perfect article" and, if already B class, consider seeking additional feedback from Wikipedia:Good articles or Wikipedia:Featured articles
.

--Article needs improved referencing so that readers may more easily
WP:ALBUM
.
Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on article class. To request a reassessment from the Album project, when concerns are addressed, please see "requesting an assessment". --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Lede - what is mentioned in the first para.

That the album is rated as one of the greatest of all time is beyond dispute and is highly-noteworthy. It is in the lede, but not in para. 1. I feel that it should be. Agreed? Boscaswell talk 10:21, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception and legacy: text repetition

There is virtually precisely the same wording in the first para of this section as is already in para.2 of the lede. Boscaswell talk 18:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do we want something on the relevance of Tangled Up In Blue?

https://www.clashmusic.com/news/the-bob-dylan-classic-that-might-contain-a-nod-to-joni-mitchell/
>A song about love, loss, and the passing of time, Bob Dylan has long refuted suggestions that it was prompted by travails in his own marriage to Sara Lowndes. “It didn’t pertain to me. It was just a concept of putting in images that defy time – yesterday, today and tomorrow. I wanted to make them all connect in some kind of a strange way.” … a nod to Joni Mitchell’s ‘Blue’. Similarly, it’s a record of love gained and lost, and according to novelist Ron Rosenbaum Bob Dylan once told him ‘Tangled Up In Blue’ emerged following a weekend of listening to Joni Mitchell’s classic album. Back in 2018, Joni Mitchell revealed that she was one of the first to hear the album, but prefers those earlier recordings in comparisons to the later takes. Htrowsle (talk) 19:33, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing major. It is quite tangential to the article. Perhaps a single sentence that mentions that Dylan's "Tangled Up in Blue" was written after listening to Blue. And then a reference taking the reader to more information. Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 12:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]