Talk:Blue hair

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: keep, December 12, 2010, see discussion. delete, March 11, 2010, see discussion. redirect to blue rinse, November 19, 2005, see discussion.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

The source for the supposed biological change to blue hair is from the eighteen hundreds, and seems likely to be suspect. Reading the actual source the passage seems anecdotal and not scientific. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:AF2F:A059:9881:3931:9735:2EE3 (talk) 00:48, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the avoidance of doubt, and repeating the opinion stated multiple times on this article's latest AfD (which it would seem Colonel Warden

Why are you creating this section when you already stated this in the ongoing AfD? Silverseren^C 18:46, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"remove notability tag as we have lots of sources now and no supporting discussion on the talk page" -- Colonel Warden playing disruptive games yet again. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 05:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, assuming the outcome of the AfD is keep, that will give the article presumed notability, since AfDs are meant to ask the community whether article topics are notable. It looks like CW jumped the gun a bit, but the AfD outcome seems a bit obvious at this point. Silverseren^C 05:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, lacking a particularly dodgy Admin closure, the outcome will most probably be "no consensus", meaning that the article has no "presumed notability". Colonel Warden deceitfully and tendentiously removed the notability tag when it was blatantly obvious that its notability is under heavy dispute at the AfD! And to be bluntly honest, I've long since lost interest in the credibility-free excuses his cheerleaders make for him. I likewise view such defences as

WP:IDIDNOTHEARTHAT (of the full weight of the evidence against him -- in this case of the repeated, policy-based, dispute of this article's notability at the AfD). Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 05:59, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

There've been a few edits to the lead claiming that blue hair can be caused by exposure to feminism. This is like saying baldness can be caused by exposure to a hair clipper. The sentence in question is clearly about physical processes, such as dyes. Any reliably-sourced link to feminism can be put later in the article, such as in the section on fashion. clpo13_(talk) 04:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's just troll vandalism. Revert, block and ignore. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blue hair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150220165511/http://ajer.synergiesprairies.ca/index.php/ajer/article/view/710 to http://ajer.synergiesprairies.ca/index.php/ajer/article/view/710

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]