Talk:Boystown (website)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconPornography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWebsites: Computing Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Adding censored screenshots of the website

This source has censored screenshots of the website that would be great for this article if they can be approved.

I can't seem to find any information on the license of the images unfortunately, there are methods of contact though so I think I'll send them an email DreamlessGlare (talk) 20:33, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022 Dubious Tag Immigration and Customs enforcement

The dubious tag has been inserted with respect ICE supposedly engaging in the investigation - Child pornography has nothing to do with immigration, and online platforms have nothing to do with customs enforcement as used within the statutory authority provisions with respect to ICE's statutory law enforcement authority under U.S. federal law. Therefore, it is extremely likely that ICE would lack statutory jurisdiction to investigate such. 98.178.191.34 (talk) 19:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@98.178.191.34: Sure you might be right that ICE had nothing to do with it, but the source provided says that they were involved in the investigation. It does not mention how each agency was involved, however the source says they were involved somehow. Wikipedia is all about providing what the trusted sources are providing. Unless you find a source that says it was not actually involved in the investigation or this source is not trustworthy, I don't think it should be removed and the dubious tag should be removed DreamlessGlare (talk) 20:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]