Talk:BrassiBase

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 18 June 2022 by reviewer Pbrks (talk · contribs). Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Hello Hughesdarren- Re your tagging of this article: When the topic is essentially documenting the existence of a website (at least at this stage), is a link to the website not considered a reference? Is it merely the lack of inline citations that triggers the tagging? I have not created many articles, and did not take the time to more than peruse the guidance, so this is new territory for me. Eric ^talk 00:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eric To establish notability you need to provide a reliable secondary source/s rather than one primary source and inline citations are preferred. This is probably why the article has been sent to draftspace. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 07:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the reply. I've added some text and a couple refs. Eric ^talk 13:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]