Talk:Bristol Arena

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bristol Arena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits concerning Bristol Arena's future

In December 2017, there have been a number of edits concerning the future of Bristol Arena. However these edits have erroneously described the project as scrapped - which it is not. The future of the project is in doubt in its current form - with a review commissioned by Bristol City Council looking at the project's value for money cited in this article.

However, despite being uncertain, the project is still officially progressing - planning permission was granted and funding is agreed, and a tender process has been underway. Furthermore, the suggestions that the current project could be scrapped propose instead that the arena could be built by converting the Brabazon Hangar at Filton - and so the project should not be considered scrapped at this stage.

The original edits were reverted on 22 December, to remove false claims. The page has since been edited further, re-emphasising that the project has been scrapped, and additionally removing the project's infobox on the page, for no apparent reason. I agree that it is important that the recent uncertainty of the project's future should feature on the page, but I suggest that this is achieved by adding an additional section to the page to this effect, opposed to presuming that the project will be scrapped when no decision to this effect has been made.

I have not reverted these edits at this stage, as I don't wish to engage in edit warring, hence my contribution here on the talk page. Sophiebastienne (talk) 00:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Update: I have just noticed that the Internet Archive Bot has restored the page's infobox and other edits - three minutes before I posted this section. Good work wikipedia! Sophiebastienne (talk) 00:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]