Talk:Broadway (Los Angeles)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Los Angeles This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force. U.S. Streets Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Streets, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of streets in the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. StreetsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. StreetsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. StreetsU.S. city street articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have done a rushed (and, I know, woefully incomplete) expansion of this article because I noticed that an editor had called into question the subject's notability. I suspect that only someone unfamiliar with Los Angeles would question Broadway's worthiness for inclusion in Wikipedia. To Angelenos (and especially to that soon-to-be-majority of the Spanish surnamed), Broadway is as significant as Hollywood, Sunset or Wilshire Boulevards. I will do additional work on the article when I get the chance. In the meantime, I hope that what I have added tonight will suffice to forestall any moves toward deletion of the article. Whyaduck 14:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is ridiculous to suggest that L.A.'s Broadway is not noteworthy enough for an article. Whyaduck has done an excellent job of finding some of the many L.A. landmarks on Broadway, I would add the Los Angeles Theatre and Clifton's Cafeteria to that list. I'm going to remove the notice. BlueDrew 03:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try and complete some additional details on the theaters on broadway. i hope to have a couple sentences of background for each, plus a current status. I know the history of them is very interesting, some currently used as churches, etc. Minnaert (talk) 23:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Broadway (Los Angeles). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061101101307/http://www.laconservancy.org:80/initiatives/initiatives_broadway.php4 to http://www.laconservancy.org/initiatives/initiatives_broadway.php4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keizers has made a number of recent changes to article, I currently have an opinion on two of those changes (i haven't looked at the other changes):

1. Moving the table of contents to above the lead section. I am opposed to TOC being above lead section. (
   MOS:LEAD
   "The lead section ... of a Wikipedia article is the section before the table of contents ...")
2. "move to mobile-friendly format" (and simplifying the section header) (3 September 2020), with the problem that (in my opinion) it makes that list look less elegant (and the division of the wikitable into West-side column and East-side column is removed) I looked at the previous version of section using Firefox on my Android cellphone and the List-of-buildings wikitable with the West-side and East-side displayed fine on my cellphone (except i do have to finger-slide right to see the East-side of the table). If I switch to Firefox Reader View, then list-of-buildings displays better on phone (ie. don't have to finger-slide right to see the East-side of the table).

(Don't know how article displays on other browsers or mobile devices). --EarthFurst (talk) 18:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Victor Clothing - Anthony Quinn Mural 2019.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• New United States Court House Los Angeles 350 W First St.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]