This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brookgreen Gardens article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
There are a lot of pictures on this page, more than are necessary and this might hurt some dial-up user who try to access the page. When I found them, they were in a big mess and formatted oddly, so I stuck them in a gallery, but I don't think that they are all necessary to the page. Could we think of removing some of them? --Sbrools(talk . contribs) 15:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is rather picture-heavy, considering how relatively little text it has. Think there's a simple option to fix. I'll work on it. --Ebyabe 17:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done! It was under the
WP:NRHP umbrella, which is how a Florida boy caught this. :) What I discovered was that most of the pix were stored at WikiCommons. So I created a page there for the gardens, made galleries and added all the ones I could find so they could be seen there. Put the more material at WikiCommons tag on the main page of this article, and removed most of the pix. Made one gallery at the bottom with a smaller representative sampling of pictures. Left the links to the sections, 'cause all that good work shouldn't go to waste. A few more could get added, but I'd say there shouldn't be more than a dozen, in any case. At least until the article itself is bigger, that is. It definitely makes it easier to read the actual article. Hope that helps! -Ebyabe 18:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Wikipedia guidelines say galleries should only be used to illustrate a particular point if necessary, and not as a general image repository. I added the "commons+cat" template, which points to the commons gallery and the commons category. This lets anyone add images as needed. They just need to remember to put any new photos int the gallery so that they are actually used in an article. Donlammers (talk) 15:22, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I removed this
"an award- winning artist known for her site-specific works," from the Lowcountry Trail section because it seemed unnecessary. Even self-serving. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brookgreen Gardens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.