Talk:Buffalo Grove ambush
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Buffalo Grove ambush article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Buffalo Grove massacre were killed the following day? | |
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Starting
Started page with information gathered from Historical marker Rattis irrittis 17:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Nomenclature
While I am waiting on a book to arrive, written last year, I am torn about whether this should be moved to Buffalo Grove ambush or Battle of Buffalo Grove. A couple reasons, one death isn't really a massacre, nor is it really a massacre if it involves armed soldiers during wartime. Any thoughts? IvoShandor 04:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- That same thought did occur to me. Did contemporary sources call it that? Do current historical works call it that? If it's the standard nomenclature we should use it, but it seems a very odd name. talk | 13:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)]
- I have seen it named this way in books, but the "m" in massacre was never capitalized, so it is hard to say. That book you were telling me about Ivo, I am pretty sure it will have some answers.--Kranar drogin 14:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- The marker says "Indian ambush," massacre is how it is described in most historical works. I am leaning toward ambush myself. IvoShandor 22:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
GA
Taking into the account the obscurity of this event, it seems that this is a reasonable level of detail that one can expect for a unexpected ambush scuffle involving six people and an unrecorded number of American Indians. A variety of quite specific and zoomed in sources have been used and that shows that the research has been through. The article foolows MOS and is NPOV and has NOR. I guess the only problem is that the article might be AfDed or proposed for merging, but I don;t think that;s up to me to decide. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- I could make a pretty strong argument for keeping but I don't think that will happen, it meets notability, its been written about in secondary sources. Has 9 sources and is over 6 kb, I don't think anyone would want to merge it. The only place would be Black Hawk War and that's getting pretty long too. : ) Also I am consulting other sources as well for potential expansion or detail. IvoShandor 05:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Buffalo Grove ambush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090815021319/http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/blackhawk/page2c.html to http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/blackhawk/page2c.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://geocities.com/old_lead/bhwchron.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071017172203/http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu:80/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.2948:25.lincoln to http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.2948:25.lincoln
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Buffalo Grove ambush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/diary/002795.asp - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927102228/http://www.leeogle.org/pchs/Historical/BuffGrov.htm to http://www.leeogle.org/pchs/Historical/BuffGrov.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.2948%3A25.lincoln
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 27 July 2017 (UTC)