Talk:Caesium chloride

This article contains a translation of Хлорид цезия from ru.wikipedia.

A fact from Caesium chloride appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that one of the worst radiation spill accidents occurred when ignorant thieves broke a steel container with about 90 grams of radioactive caesium chloride? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/June.

Um, why when all of the references use the modern English spelling, does this article use the UK spelling? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.207.248.117 (talk) 17:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UK English is Modern English--Kbbbb (talk) 11:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Sartori is currently facing legal action concerning the deaths of 25 out of 50 patients, that were treated with Caesium chloride.

It would be worth noting that the treatment is not proven via clinical trials or via scientific studies, it is currently and "alternative therapy". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.16.215 (talk) 06:30, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I have referenced Hellfried Sartori. The fact that he made the claims of it being useful in cancer treatment and Wikipedia has referenced this makes it all the more necessary.--Kbbbb (talk) 11:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I find the new revision "interesting" but bordering on overspecialized. It also contains information that would require huge effort to find in the western literature. Some of the refs are inaccessible, but those supporting relatively unique claims were left intact. I replaced some that could be accessed (and critiqued) by WP-en readers. Soviet inorganic chemistry was so isolated so long that the perspectives offered by their scientists often have unusual perspective, which can be healthy, but their contextualization is often a little strange. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The statement “CsCl changes to NaCl structure on heating.” is clearly incorrect. This does not occur. —A chemist 2600:8806:3300:2F:4136:3168:F1A0:F77D (talk) 19:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]