Talk:Caledonia, Ontario

Caledonia Toll House was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 August 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Caledonia, Ontario. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Ontario / Communities Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario. This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities. Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Should this article feature the land claim the native people are protesting about?

It's now discussed under "History," with a link to the main article at

Caledonia occupation. Samaritan 00:42, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I changed the link to Oasis (restaraunt).

Who wrote this? This page is bewilderingly awful. This should just be taken down altogether if its going to be this bad.There's maybe 3 salvageable sentences here; the rest is clearly biased and the grammar is abhorrent.

I remember reading a early Prime Minister taught in Caledonia, anyone want to look into it?

This article is so extremely biased to the side of the native occupiers, that it provides incorrect information. The information is so inaccurate that it can not be used as a valid source of knowledge, which damages the credibility of Wikipedia as whole.

It's gone now. But it was extreme on both sides.

The land dispute section of this article still seems incredibly biased in favour of the natives. It paints the other side as neo-nazi racists who hate natives "regardless of the issues". Andn that's beside the complete lack of sources. MatttK (talk) 03:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Famous people should have their own page, the Lukas O'Reilly doesn't even go to the right person, and Ashley Coles doesn't have her own page, both are being removed.

What is this? I've never heard of it and it isn't explained. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.244.247.34 (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am hoping someone can provide me with some information on Ken Thompson the artist (Impressionist.) I understand, he was from Caledonia.

Charlene —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.150.29.71 (talk) 14:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There should be a link to the caledonia land dispute article at the bottom under "see also", which is why I came here, and it took me forever to find the actualy acrticle on the issue since I didn't know what name to look for. I'm not sure the protocol for adding that so I'm not going to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.128.44.222 (talk) 02:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that some people don't like the information about the land dispute to appear in the article. Liek it or not, it is part of the history of Caledonia. I've added material back about the dispute in the history section. It's a short summary and anybody who wants more detail can follow the wikilink to the main article. -- Whpq (talk) 14:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caledonia, Ontario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426071331/http://reclamation.kisikew.org/images/haldimand_tract_map.jpg to http://reclamation.kisikew.org/images/haldimand_tract_map.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lorrie Burke a long-time school mate and friend is losing her home say the MTO. Lorrie home is also A Canada's Historic Place, for some of yous on my facebook not familiar with this home I have included a photo post. If anyone knows how to help Lorrie save not just A Canada’s Historic Place but her home, please help. HARCOURT EXPROPRIATION – SUMMARY • Lorrie Harcourt has owned and lived in her home at 4 Argyle Street, Caledonia since 1986. • Residing in her home is a tenant with accessibility issues, at times her adult children and at times her grandchildren who live with her as an alternative to living in foster care. • This home to Ms. Harcourt is also used for her hairdressing business, as it is conveniently located in a prominent location in downtown Caledonia. • In 2014, Ms. Harcourt was approached by the Ministry of Transportation for Ontario (“MTO”), as it required access and interests in her property to facilitate its reconstruction of the bridge along Argyle Street crossing the Grand River (the “Works”). • Between 2014 and 2019, MTO sought access to Ms. Harcourt’s property and maintained that it required temporary and limited interests in her property to carry out its works. • MTO required access to her property, but refused to compensate Ms. Harcourt for such interests in the property as would be payable for lands that were acquired in accordance with the Expropriations Act. Ms. Harcourt was willing to grant this access, so long as she was given due process and fair compensation as is required by the Expropriations Act. • MTO stated that if Ms. Harcourt would not give access on its terms, it would expropriate her entire property and take away her home. • MTO is now proceeding to a hearing on June 21, 2019 for approval to expropriate Ms. Harcourt’s entire property, although its own documents and admissions show that it only requires temporary and limited interests over portions of her property for monitoring during its construction. This means it does not have to take her entire home. • Although Ms. Harcourt is prepared to grant access on terms that are fair, MTO is not prepared to agree to such terms and is going to a hearing to take her entire home. • Ms. Harcourt is concerned that the compensation MTO offers will not enable her to relocate and will, therefore, leave her in a situation where she may not have a home for herself, her long-term tenant, her adult children and her grandchildren. • MTO has not provided any assurances on how she will be able to relocate, whether compensation will allow her to relocate or whether it will be paid in way so that she can have a replacement property before possession of her current home is taken. • Ms. Harcourt is not looking for a windfall from MTO, but simply wishes to keep her home, business and lifestyle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.91.226.222 (talk) 23:44, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]