Talk:Camp Carroll

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Vietnam This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Military history: Fortifications This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Fortifications task force

I propose merging

Oops sorry about the photo, I did not know mannhai was a copyright abuser. I think the article should not be merged since i found a book called “Vietnam's Forgotten Army: Heroism and Betrayal in the ARVN” by Andrew Weist which investigates the base commander’s career in great detail as well as all the events surrounding the surrender such as its significance, nearby battles, small engagements, leadership decisions and the role of American advisors. If given some time, I think the addition of this information would merit the article existing separately Portwineconsumer (talk) 11:37, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Once you get the book you can add the relevant details here or to the

First Battle of Quang Tri or create a page for Pham Van Dinh, but there just isn't enough detail about what happened over those 3 days to justify a standalone page at present. Mztourist (talk) 16:54, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

User:Portwineconsumer I have seen what you added from Weist, some of which contradicts contemporary accounts that the advisers were evacuated once it was clear that Pham Van Dinh planned to surrender the base. There's nothing much new there and its still not enough for a standalone page. Mztourist (talk) 03:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok yep i agree with you there really is not anything that warrants the article existing. I definitely should have checked other articles before creating this. Portwineconsumer (talk) 03:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will merge the details and create the redirect, thanks. Mztourist (talk) 03:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have merged everything into

First Battle of Quang Tri as that gives the full context. Mztourist (talk) 03:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]