Talk:Catholic spirituality

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Catholic spirituality article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Catholicism Mid‑importance

Catholic spirituality is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes

for Catholicism articles

Spirituality

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Created

I made this article from scratch. I decided to start with the 6 spiritualities with which I am most familiar. There are other Catholic spiritualities - Opus Dei, Neo-Catechumenal, etc. - with which I am less familiar, but I hope others will add them. 67.80.139.189 01:39, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Name move?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus. --liquidGhoul 00:11, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Catholic tradition generally. NOTE: Talk page name does not match article name. Fishhead64 00:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support per nom. Fishhead64 00:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Suport per nom. — Gareth Hughes 11:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Add other content here if it is felt lacking. No reason other schools of catholic spirituality shouldn't be described. It lists Taize (undeveloped at present) as a distinct school of spirituality. Gimmetrow 18:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The article is not named "Spirituality of churches of the catholic tradition", but is "Catholic Church Spirituality", and the title "Catholic Church" redirects to the main article mentioned above. -SynKobiety 01:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - There is nothing presented to substantiate that most (or even any) English speakers would look for information about Anglican spirituality (or any other denomination's hierarchy) in an article titled "Catholic Church spirituality." The title is reasonably unambiguous as it is. -SynKobiety 01:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have a friend who is a Ukrainian Catholic Priest. He tells me that the Orthodox use the terms "uniate" and "Roman" as a slur to imply being traitors to the East. They would never call themselves "Roman Catholic," but members of the Catholic Church. It seems that Wikipedia honors self identification--and therefore should in this case as with others. --Vita Dulcedo et Spes Nostra 05:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This move is in direct violation of WP naming conventions and policies. For a thorough discussion of this and other related naming issues based entirely on WP policies, please see:
CC vs. RCC --Vaquero100 16:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Support per nom. —
ra 17:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Oppose The title is unambiguous and unoffensive as it is; if someone wants to add Anglican movements under their own heading, they can do that (and with the rename, they'd have to make a new page) Cheyinka 20:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment How about the
  Old Catholics? Fishhead64 08:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Oppose - Why has this Talk page already been changed to "Talk:Roman Catholic spirituality". --WikiCats 07:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Someone moved it. I just moved it back to match the article name. Vegaswikian 22:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

tone

This article, though it contains good information, is often written from what is called in other WIkipedia contexts an "in-universe" perspective. It mostly seems to assume that people reading the article are already immersed in Catholic tradition; it also seems at moments to assume that readers are seeking spiritual guidance rather than information. (They may be; but they will need to explore further.) I rewrote the first sentence a little. It might be helpful to elucidate the subtle grammatical difference between the two Latin passages. I'm also assuming, though I don't know, that the acceptance of faith (distinguished from personal acts of faith) pertains to the Credo? Cynwolfe (talk) 16:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catholic spirituality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311125047/http://gabriel.mps.ohio-state.edu:80/od/opus.see to http://gabriel.mps.ohio-state.edu/od/opus.see

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

I'd like to suggest possible changes to the outline, specifically, to add a section on "Mendicant Orders" and to move (at least) the sections on Franciscan, Dominican and Servite spiritualities there. The Franciscan, Dominican and Servite charisms are not monastic, and their members in what are known as the "first orders" are properly referred to as "friars" and not as "monks." Similarly, the Redemptorists and Jesuits (Ignatian spirituality is the creation of Ignatius of Loyola, one of the founders of the Society of Jesus) are also not monastic orders, but neither are they "mendicant" orders.

An alternative, possibly better, would be to change the heading from "Monastic Orders" to "Charisms" as this would allow the section to be expanded at length as contributors can add in summaries from many different Catholic spiritual traditions. This would also invite a brief explanation of what charisms are in Catholicism, and how these different approaches fit into a cohesive whole within the Catholic Church. GHColley (talk) 03:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]