Talk:Cell signaling
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cell signaling article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||
??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | |
This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Top-importance). |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Smith2152, Brown855, Kadedoss. Peer reviewers: Gabrielle Worley, Brown855, Morton36.
Above undated message substituted from
Duplicate articles on cell signaling/communication
Ever since JWSchmidt proposed merging several overlapping articles in 2006, a couple more articles have cropped up. One is
- Support. I think that since these include some clear WP:BOLDly and create a clear and straightforward structure that presents the science as plainly as possible. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)]
- Thank you, will do so. danielkueh (talk)
- @Chiswick Chap: Done. That said, there needs to be some cleanup for sure. danielkueh (talk) 21:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Well, we can tag it for copy-editing and suchlike, and I can look for obvious overlaps, but if you need an expert mind on the job then maybe Evolution and evolvability might give it a once-over ... Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- I have to admit, cell signalling is probably my weakest area of biochemistry! I've emailed a couple of people with better knowledge than me to ask if they'll give some feedback on the actual substance. The overall merge of cell signaling and cell communication seems logical though as the distinction was neither clear nor consistently used! It might perhaps benefit from greater clarity on which types of cell signalling are found in which organisms (I'm thinking of the Ethylene). There's also a 2019 review doi:10.3390/ijms20133292 that give a good overview (and fig 1 is particularly useful). T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 11:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)]
- I have to admit, cell signalling is probably my weakest area of biochemistry! I've emailed a couple of people with better knowledge than me to ask if they'll give some feedback on the actual substance. The overall merge of cell signaling and cell communication seems logical though as the distinction was neither clear nor consistently used! It might perhaps benefit from greater clarity on which types of cell signalling are found in which organisms (I'm thinking of the
- Well, we can tag it for copy-editing and suchlike, and I can look for obvious overlaps, but if you need an expert mind on the job then maybe Evolution and evolvability might give it a once-over ... Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Chiswick Chap: Done. That said, there needs to be some cleanup for sure. danielkueh (talk) 21:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, will do so. danielkueh (talk)
- That's great. I'll have a go at adding a bit on quorum sensing. Another thing is the long list of (clearly) related topics at "See also". I suspect many of these should be integrated into the article so that the major signalling pathways are at least mentioned and linked in the text. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Whatever you guys think is appropriate, please feel free to make the necessary changes. I made some major cuts after the merge just to clean the slate a little and keep the article a little more focused. It can re-expand for sure. Thanks for your help! danielkueh (talk) 12:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Not my area really, but as several of the pathways are in fact in the text, I've ripped them out of the See also list. I think the lead section may need some work to cover the merged items; and per Tom Shafee above, the discussion needs to be extended to cover other groups of organisms, as it's quite animal/vertebrate/human-focused at the moment. As a top-level article its job is to indicate the breadth of the field; subsidiary articles can then focus on the many different details. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Sound like a plan. So far, I've been relying on Alberts et al. (2017) Molecular Biology of the Cell [1] and Lodish et al. (2008-2021) Molecular Cell Biology [2] as guides. Alberts does cover plant signaling at the end, and we can add (re add) it for sure as well as other organisms (bacteria, etc). Certainly open to other sources and expanding the scope of this article. danielkueh (talk) 13:33, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Not my area really, but as several of the pathways are in fact in the text, I've ripped them out of the See also list. I think the lead section may need some work to cover the merged items; and per Tom Shafee above, the discussion needs to be extended to cover other groups of organisms, as it's quite animal/vertebrate/human-focused at the moment. As a top-level article its job is to indicate the breadth of the field; subsidiary articles can then focus on the many different details. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Whatever you guys think is appropriate, please feel free to make the necessary changes. I made some major cuts after the merge just to clean the slate a little and keep the article a little more focused. It can re-expand for sure. Thanks for your help! danielkueh (talk) 12:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- That's great. I'll have a go at adding a bit on quorum sensing. Another thing is the long list of (clearly) related topics at "See also". I suspect many of these should be integrated into the article so that the major signalling pathways are at least mentioned and linked in the text. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
@Evolution and evolvability: Thanks for the review article. I just took a look. Love the figures. Organization of the topics are somewhat similar, albeit in much greater detail. So at least we're on the right path. Overall, very helpful. danielkueh (talk) 15:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Excellent, it's coming together nicely. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Cell Biology Honors
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MatthewGuareschi (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by MatthewGuareschi (talk) 20:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Forms of cell signaling / gasocrine signaling
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
- Specific text to be added or removed: Cell signaling that occurs via the binding of gaseous signaling molecules or gasotransmitters ligands with gasoreceptors are termed as gasocrine signaling. The gasoreceptor for NO is soluble guanylyl cyclase. Gasocrine signaling due to ethylene via ethylene gasoreceptors promotes fruit ripening.
- Reason for the change: Gasocrine signaling is a new scientific term that specific for signaling mediated via gasotransmitter/gaseous signaling molecule/volatile organic compounds and gasoreceptors. Gasoreceptor is not a fictional or hypothetical term. I request the content moderator to read the scientific arguments in the manuscript here: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00004.2024.
- References supporting change: The term gasoreceptor and gasocrine signaling is published in American Physiological Society journal. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00004.2024.
Zebrafishgroup (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Not done - The concepts of gasoreceptors and gasocrine signaling are personal interpretations by Zebrafishgroup,