Talk:Centre William Rappard

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Switzerland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Text which can be found in the OTRS ticket. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2009060310047417 . This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

• Co-licensed under GFDL and CC-By-SA. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reason why this page has been deleted? I do not see any copyright violation here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lamerica (talk • contribs) May 27 2009

Wikipedia's policies do not allow the duplication of non-free text without verification of permission or proper handling under our

non-free content policy and guideline

. This material still contains text duplicated from the pdf. For example, compare this from the article:

The original site of the Centre William Rappard was part of an estate formed from the Rappard and Bloch properties, and contained two mansions. The original Villa Rappard was built in 1785 (now a Montessori school). The Villa Bloch was demolished in 1957 to make way for the south wing expansion of the Centre William Rappard. The Villa Rappard and land, situated to the north of the original site, were acquired by the ILO in 1963.

With this from the source:

The original site of the Centre William Rappard was part of an estate formed from the property of two families. It already contained two mansions. The Villa Bloch was demolished in 1957 to make way for the south wing expansion of the Centre William Rappard. The Villa Rappard and land, situated to the north of the original site, were acquired by the ILO in 1963.

Material from the World Trade Organization is explicitly protected by copyright (see [1]). While the WTO allows reproduction for non-commercial purpose, their license is not compatible with Wikipedia's, because they require that they be informed of such use and because they do not permit commercial reuse without written permission (both of which requirements impose restrictions beyond those allowed by

GFDL). It seems that there has already been some work underway to revise this material into original language, but it must be completely rewritten unless we receive permission to license it under GFDL and CC-BY-SA from the source. The temporary space now linked from the front of this page may be used for that purpose. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

File:Cwr chicharro y aguera.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Cwr chicharro y aguera.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 12 October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 14:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply ]