Talk:Cephalotus

carnivorous plants. For more information, visit the project page.Carnivorous plantsWikipedia:WikiProject Carnivorous plantsTemplate:WikiProject Carnivorous plantscarnivorous plant articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Plants (assessed as Mid-importance).

Australia: Western Australia / Biota Mid‑importance

Cephalotus is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Mid-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Umm... speaking as a member of a carnivorous plant society, and as someone who grows these plants, I can honestly say I have NEVER heard of cephs referred to as the "fly catcher plant". A search of google shows that only Britannica calls them by this name. (This name could of course refer to ANY carnivorous plant.) nick 17:09, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise: I've been fiddling with most of the CP articles of late (updating taxoboxes, mostly), and there's some factually iffy stuff in some of them. I think the main Carnivorous_plant page could do with an edit too, as there's not much on it except a list and some largely irrelevant fluff about Little Shop of Horrors...

Yeah, the page on

pitcher plants is pretty poor as well. If I get time, and if the wikipedia servers pick up a bit, I might rewrite a couple of these pages. nick 14:48, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply

]

Should there be mention of some of the cultivars available out there? eg. Hummer's, Giant, all red etc. forms. Flytrap canada 04:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably be best to mention only those cultivars that have actualy been registered. Other forms could be mentioned but not listed, if you know what I mean. Feel free to add this. --NoahElhardt 23:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[Dumping a note to follow up later] This claim is regularly sourced to Davies et al. (2004) "Darwin’s abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms" but I can't find anything on it in that paper; perhaps I'm going blind? The same conclusion is drawn by Crayn et al. (2006) "Molecular phylogeny and dating reveals an Oligo-Miocene radiation of dry-adapted shrubs (former Tremandraceae) from rainforest tree progenitors (Elaeocarpaceae) in Australia" and it has

I have just modified one external link on Cephalotus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070329173932/http://www.botany.org:80/carnivorous_plants/cephalotus.php to http://www.botany.org/carnivorous_plants/cephalotus.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]