Talk:Cessna 180 Skywagon

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Aviation: Aircraft This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Recent Japanese TV and model kits depict what looks like a 180 on the Japanese ship

It would need a more reliable ref than a modelling website that to add! - Ahunt (talk) 11:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly! I am getting the ball rolling here! The TV just released in Japan is the history of the expeditions and they clearly refer to a "Cessna", but little else. I am looking Flightsoffancy (talk) 18:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Cessna 180 Skywagon/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following

Last edited at 09:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 11:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041107090429/http://www.nasm.si.edu:80/research/aero/aircraft/cessna180.htm to http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero/aircraft/cessna180.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Ahunt (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090529070822/http://www.skywagons.org/180_story.asp?menuID=7~7 to http://www.skywagons.org/180_story.asp?menuID=7~7

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article says Mock's plane was a 1953 model. The photos of her plane show 3 side windows. According to the article, 3 windows weren't introduced until 1964 (the same year as her flight). Can't have it both ways! Dan Bollinger (talk) 12:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The image in the article of N1538C show two-side windows so I cant see where the problem is. MilborneOne (talk) 13:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An FAA registration inquiry for N1538C shows it is indeed a 1953 model. The photo shows only two side windows. - Ahunt (talk) 13:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]