Talk:Championnat National

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Start‑class Low‑importance

	project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pro-Am

I think it would be useful to show which clubs are pro and which are amateur. Sadly I wouldn't know how to go about doing this myself. sʟυмɢυм • т • c 22:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Le nouveau logo FFF.png

The image

requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clubs are wrong

Le Mans, Sedan, and Rouen aren't playing in the Championnat this year because they were relegated for entering administration. Paris FC, Bourg-Péronnas, and Uzes Pont-du-Gard replaced them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ialangford (talk • contribs) 19:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Championnat National. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History section

I removed the History section, added no doubt in good faith. The section talked about the future of the competition (upcoming restructuring, and the potential future relationship with/as Ligue 3) and nothing in the past. It was very badly translated (from somewhere, not looked where). Would suggest this material belongs in a "Future of the competition" section, not as history. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 15:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Championnat National

Gricehead, why did you not replace Sedan for Nancy? You know that Nancy will stay up because Sedan is excluded from the league. 2A00:23C8:3984:6201:59BC:274E:3F4F:68BA (talk) 08:16, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Gricehead (talk) 08:38, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]