Talk:Chicago hip hop

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Music/Music genres task force Stub‑class Illinois Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chicago Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is "Rhyme Scheme" a mistaken reference to Rhymefest? He's released several tracks in advance of his upcoming album, including "Brand New (f. Kanye West)" and "Dynomite". Wbakker2 13:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake -- Rhyme Scheme is mentioned as a latino rapper. My ignorance. Wbakker2 13:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone needs to source the opening statement "The Chicago hip hop scene is one of America's most prominent..." or it will be removed. You need a citation from reliable source and it needs to be attributed to that source.--Isotope23 18:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will this work? --24.73.244.90 05:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That says " Chicago hip-hop is specifically this or that; it comprises a tremendous diversity of sound and style", but I don't see where it says the scene is one of the most prominent.--Isotope23 16:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This was released in 1978, correct? Is the 1980 version different from the 1978 original? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.172.130.146 (talk) 06:47, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]