Talk:Chilean rodeo

	Chilean rodeo was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 6, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chile High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Sports This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles To-do list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required. * Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show." Expand : Professional sports (crucial article explaining the salaried undertaking of sports) * Sport industry (currently a sub-stub) Photo : for pages listed in Category:Wikipedia requested images of sports and games and sub-categories. Stubs : work on articles in Category:Sports stubs Update : List of world sports championships Other : Translate the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Wikipedia to English Wikipedia which was marked in red. olympic ) sports to be part of this project RfCs: answer requests for comment Equine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .RodeoWikipedia:WikiProject RodeoTemplate:WikiProject RodeoRodeo articles

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2021 and 7 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wilfo1213, Beneasley.

Above undated message substituted from

• Statements that are likely to be challenged and statistics need inline citations.
• Imperial measurements should be accompanied by the metric equivalent in brackets, and vice versa. A convertion template can be used, such as {{convert|5|m|ft|0}}.
• There should not be anything in the lead not mentioned in the rest of the article.
• Only full dates or dates with a day and a month should be linked.
• Web references need the author, publisher, publishing date and access date. Epbr123 (talk) 10:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article failed

1. Well written?: Fail, very sparse overview, prose does not "flow," quite disorganized, long history section, little else, no idea what this competion is or what spectators need to know to enjoy the event. Has [[WP:NPOV}Neutrality]] issues, does not actually explain much about what actually happens, etc.

2. Factually accurate?: Fail, may be accurate as far as it goes, but not a lot of cites, no support for statements like "the greatest," many

peacock words

and unencyclopedic commentary

3. Broad in coverage?: Fail, article is very short, many red links, not well explained

4. Neutral point of view?: Fail, reads like a promotional brochure or ad copy, not an encyclopedic

5. Article stability? Pass, but it needs a LOT of work to get anywhere close to GA

6. Images?: Pass - could be better, but acceptable

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.

The "Criticism" section is directly copied from this webpage: http://www.liquisearch.com/chilean_rodeo/criticism.

Rishi (talk) 03:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's the other way around, looks like a wikipedia mirror to me, but we could ask some other folks to look into it. Montanabw^(talk) 00:01, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's the other way around. Liquisearch is a known mirror, and they credit wikipedia at the bottom of the page. Kuru (talk) 13:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good to confirm. Montanabw^(talk) 08:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chilean rodeo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207161949/http://www.familia.cl/ContenedorTmp/Rodeo/rodeo.htm to http://www.familia.cl/ContenedorTmp/Rodeo/rodeo.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]