Talk:Circus (Eraserheads album)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - as nom. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Support; keep redirect. Red Slash 03:44, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - The move proposal maybe reasonable, although the title applied is simply being faithful to the band's album 112.198.77.148 (talk) 09:03, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Support
  MOS:TM -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Oppose. Doesn't a
  guideline? If there were nothing else called "Circus", then I'd happily go along with a case change; but there are other things called "Circus", so we need to disambiguate, and using the actual name is better than changing the case then making up our own suffix and nailing it onto the end of the title. There is a unique title which is used by various sources; guess what it is - it's certainly not "Circus (Eraserheads album)". bobrayner (talk) 21:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I am not aware of any policy that demands that we use CiRcuS, and WP:CAPS are often used in cases like this. Also we don't need reliable sources for dab purposes since we are not calling this Circus (Eraserheads album) but calling this Circus and stating that it is an album to separate this from other article named circus. This is a subtle but very important difference. The only way I can see reliable sources playing a role would be someone was disputing the fact that this was an album. For example, I doubt than any reliable sources called the video game Contra Contra (video game), or the monster truck Bigfoot Bigfoot (truck) but they have been in use for years uncontested since there is no dispute that they are a video game and truck, the same applies here.--174.95.111.89 (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. For the above-mentioned reasons. Lientinge (talk) 06:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.