Talk:City of Lover

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleCity of Lover has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 27, 2023Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 2, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the TV broadcast of the Taylor Swift concert City of Lover only included half the set list of the original concert?

Italicize

Isn't the title supposed to be written in italics?

MOS:ITALICTITLE
specifically says that Television and radio programs, specials, shows, series and serials, are written in italics. Since City of Lover was aired as a television special, I think it need to be italicized. Just wanna hear anyone's thoughts on this.

Lover (Live from Paris)

Should the limited-edition LP have its own article or be a section of this (City of Lover) article? It qualifies

WP:N. ℛonherry 15:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

I think it should be a part of the City of Lover article just like the long pond studio sessions live album. ℛonherry 15:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. It should be merged. The entirely different article makes it seem likes it's a truly standalone album, but it's even less than standalone than folklore LPSS. It wasn't really an "album" on its own. 70.49.189.175 (talk) 19:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal with Lover (Live from Paris)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



I propose merging

Ippantekina (talk) 02:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Oppose. I agree with
talk) 13:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Weak Oppose: I feel that the article is fine in its own right and has enough new information to have it stand out as its own article, however it wouldn't be a bad idea to make it a new section in the original article. I'm 50/50 on it and I feel it'd be better to keep it as-is, but moving the new information regarding the release of the LP itself to a section in the main article could work as well. AverageLogic (talk) 15:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merge, excluding the tracklist because it did not receive any significant coverage in terms of critical reviews or analysis. Heartfox (talk) 22:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. There's really no unique information for this to stand on its own, the only thing that's unique and relevant to the LP is the Commercial performance. Other than that, it's just info about City of Lover again.--Giorgio Zeniquel (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; Agree with Ss112
talk) 02:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.