Talk:Clarifications (The Wire)

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Clarifications (The Wire)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following

several discussions in past years

, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

re: Omar's body tag switch

I always interpreted it that the scene was about the extent of Omar's was ghetto fame; so when the morgue worker read the name he had heard stories of him and knew the old white guy was not Omar. It follows from the escalating stories of his death going around the street. 'Bureaucratic error is corrected' doesnt make much of a scene.

>At the close of the episode Omar’s corpse is at the morgue being processed by the medical examiners. One of the staff >notices a tag, which lists Omar Little as an AAM (African American Male), on the bag for a Caucasian decedent who lies >adjacent to Omar’s body. The assistant medical examiner realizes the tags have been confused and puts the correct tag back >on Omar’s corpse before sealing the body bags.

Last edited at 00:15, 2 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 11:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Recent Edit

I have edited the summary as it is incorrect regarding the Davis case. He is not protected by double jeopardy because his falsified loan application (and the relevant criminal charge) were not included in the state trial. This is brought up in an earlier episode when Lester and Pearlman first bring the case to Bond's attention (in which Bond specifically decides not to bring this charge), and is also touched upon in this episode when the US attorney refers to this evidence as in their "back pocket."

Requested move 7 September 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 21:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PRIMARYTOPIC test for clarifications. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Support per nom, and redirect to exiting Disambiguation page. Paintspot Infez (talk) 23:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Pinging participants in similar

Talk:Cutbacks discussion: @Crouch, Swale and Egsan Bacon:. Paintspot Infez (talk) 01:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Weak support per views[[1]] of which those for Clarification and stabilization of wine are similar (1,664 v 1,681 for the episode) but we don't know haw many people search for either with "Clarifications". Crouch, Swale (talk) 07:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support, basically per
WP:PLURALPT, as the plural of a common noun with no primary topic in either the singular or plural form. bd2412 T 16:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Support obviously. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.