Talk:Columbus Control Centre

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Europe: ESA Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by ESA task force.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below.

WP:ENGVAR advocates using a certain national variety of English when there are "strong national ties to a topic", and that does not seem to be the case here. It also notes that we should tend to "retain the existing variety", which seems at least as applicable. Dekimasu よ! 03:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Talk 18:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since
Wikipedia's naming conventions
.

Leave it alone per its parent, the
WP:ENGVAR should not be read to enforce British usage on everything east of the Atlantic, especially on a point on which British usage is not {teste OED) unanimous. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 00:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Britain is a member of ESA, the USA is not. What more evidence is needed? --GW_Simulations

Talk 07:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Oppose. It is a part of the ISS and the common spelling for that should be used. If I recall the press conference a few days ago, ESA is an 8.3% partner. So the US share and influence is larger. Also the guideline is to use the first spelling. 07:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - per the comment below, "center" is how the people there choose to spell the name when they are writing in English. (sdsds - talk) 09:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The term is used here, On Nasa's official website, as Center. The official name trumps concerns over proper English. No objection to the redirect using the term with Centre, as that is indeed a reasonable search term. ZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 14:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

Is http://www2.gsoc.dlr.de/columbus/home.htm the Center's website? If it is, I would stick with the American spelling of the word just because the logo and links all use 'Center'. --Chipmunker (talk) 18:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge proposal

mergeto}} templates suggesting merging the content of this article into Columbus (ISS module)

.

Oppose - This
notable in its own right as the first western-European mission control center for a human spaceflight and (b) because although the control center is notable, it is only tangentially of interest to most readers of the Columbus (ISS module) article. (sdsds - talk) 21:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Support - Because it is the same project, the control center is related enough to a layperson that it should be in the same article as the module. If the section grows too large and becomes too independent, it can be separated later. -kslays (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Well, it is only sort-of the same project. It turns out the Col-CC will also be used to supervise the flights of the Automated Transfer Vehicles. Don't you agree it would be a shame to duplicate the same material about the center in both the Columbus and ATV articles? (sdsds - talk) 21:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It is not strictly true that Col-CC will supervise ATV. Col-CC is reponsible for providing the Ground Segment Connectivity for ATV, as it is for all European manned space activities, but ATV has it's own control centre in Toulouse. - Unionjackgirl (talk) 22:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Concur with first comments on notability and interest - Unionjackgirl (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re-visit of Spelling of Columbus Control Centre/Center

A proposal to return to using the European/British spelling of Centre.

As per ESA's offical Columbus page [1], it is officially known as the Columbus Control Centre, and believe this should be the offical Wiki title.