Talk:Combat box

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / Technology / North America / United States / World War II C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Military science, technology, and theory task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force

If anyone has access to pictures of planes in formations or diagrams of them, please feel free to add to this article. I haven't yet found any public domain diagrams.--Buckboard 14:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

I've just added a reference to the 398th Bomb Group Combat Formations - if I can get to it I'll make new illustrations for this article based on this info brain 14:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the Top View of the Formation Diagram in the upper right hand corner there appears to be an error with the labeling of the High and Low Groups. Vertically the groups ascend in height to the right. Thus Low is on the Left, Lead is higher, and High to the Right is higher. See 398th Bomb Group Combat Formations. I hesitate to make changes to this complex diagram. If you would like to discuss, please contact the webmaster at 398th Bomb Group via the address link in lower left hand corner. DaveJ08 (talk) 23:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]