Talk:Combat search and rescue

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / Cold War Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

We have a non-sourced list of aircraft in this article. In the past it has been a bit of a cruft magnet. Does anyone think it is worth retaining in the article? - Ahunt (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not worth retaining list, but a few aircraft should be mentioned in the History section. DexDor (talk) 06:07, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a good suggestion, perhaps they should be mentioned just in descriptions of actions that they took part in, with refs too, of course! - Ahunt (talk) 11:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since there are many special units out there which are capable for CSAR missions, maybe we should rename that list to something like 'Units specialized in CSAR'. What do you all think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Der rikkk (talk • contribs) 07:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest the list be deleted from this article or moved to an article like List of reconnaissance units. Those units that have been involved with notable missions or developments in CSAR techniques etc should be mentioned in other sections of this article (like aircraft etc). DexDor (talk) 20:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I think that is a good idea. If they are worth mentioning then they should be mentioned in a narrative and not just a bunch of lists. Let's wait a couple of days for more feedback and then I am thinking both lists can go, unless there are objections. - Ahunt (talk) 21:08, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay lacking any objections I'll go ahead and removed them both.- Ahunt (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.army-technology.com/glossary/combat-search-and-rescue.html

  Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—

I have just modified 2 external links on Combat search and rescue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080510152002/http://www.army-technology.com/glossary/combat-search-and-rescue.html to http://www.army-technology.com/glossary/combat-search-and-rescue.html
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5zHdif1Rp?url=http://www.f-16.net/varia_article10.html to http://www.f-16.net/varia_article10.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Ahunt (talk) 15:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links got lost? Needs CSAR support! GeoVenturing (talk) 14:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Found reliable library source of CSAR books:

https://fairchild-mil.libguides.com/c.php?g=953871&p=6881998

GeoVenturing (talk) 14:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]