Talk:Coming Up to Breathe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
London Session Orchestra
?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AJona1992 (talk · contribs) 03:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

here
for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (
    lists
    )
    :
    Failing article solely because the prose (and WP:MOS issues) is not up to GA standards. Here are a few examples (these are just a few, there maybe even more)
  • Coming Up to Breathe is the fifth major label, full-length studio album from MercyMe.
  • Released in on April 25, 2006,
  • Coming Up to Breathe received almost universally positive reviews from critics
  • "Something Like You" has been compared to the sound of U2 (particularly the song "Where The Streets Have No Name"),[6] while "3:42 a.m. (Writer's Block)" has been described as 'soulful classic rock'
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
    "Background" has basically every period cited with FN#1 which makes the article look even more clumsy
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
    Saying "Coming Up to Breathe received almost universally positive reviews." is being biased
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Active users have been reverting vandalism, which was last done back in mid November 2011
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
    WP:NFCC; its rational is very very weak and does not give a suitable reasoning on why a non-free artwork gives any educational value. The second file
    completely fails WP:NFCC.
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I suggest you fixed all of these concerns, get it
    WP:PR and then re-nominate at a later date. Best, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 23:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 18:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


here
for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (
    lists
    )
    :
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to
    reliable sources):
    c (OR
    ):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Infobox

  • For the "Recorded" section, show what year it was recorded followed by a semicolon and a list of studios where it was recorded (Ex: 2009; Studio 1, Studio 2)
  • Singles do not need to be sourced in the infobox because they have their own respective articles

Lead

  • Released on April 25, 2006... "Released on April 25, 2006 by INO Records..."

Background

  • No issues

Composition

  • Two subsections not necessary in this context

Critical reception

  • No issues

Singles

  • An album cut from the album, "No More No Less", spent one frame on the Hot Christian Songs chart, debuting and peaking at number thirty..[31] Get rid of extra period at end of statement

Release

  • Replace all of the "No."s with "number"

Track listing

  • No issues

Personnel

  • No issues

Charts and certifications

  • No issues

References

  • If you mention a work or publisher in a reference and it is wiki-linked, do not wiki-link it for further references
  • Only italicize publications in the "work=" parameter
  • Proofread all of these to ensure errors are not made; for a guideline to follow, use
    WP:REFERENCE


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are a few prose issues, and things mostly just need to be proofread in the references section for this article to pass. I will give you the general seven days to fix mistakes, address points I have made, and/or ask me any questions that you have. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All issues have now been addressed, so I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work you are doing! Rp0211 (talk2me) 01:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 01:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Coming Up to Breathe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please contact Oshwah or another administrator to protect this page if I ever keep reverting edits, Binksternet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Better Than My Life (talkcontribs) 20:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]