Talk:Comparison of Kanban software

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Software: Computing This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works.

Hello, my name is Patricia Wagner and I'm an employee of Microsoft. I work in the Cloud+Enterprise division as a content publisher for Visual Studio Team Services, Team Foundation Server, and Application Lifecycle Management products. We are reviewing Wikipedia articles that relate to our areas and would like to update some to better represent the current state and features of our products. Please review the changes below and let me know if they are acceptable to you. Thank you very much for your consideration.

In the "General information" section, please add two lines at the end:

Team Foundation Server Yes Yes Yes Proprietary

Visual Studio Team Services Yes No Yes Proprietary

In the "Features" section, table "Kanban Principles Visualize Workflow Limit WIP Manage Flow" please add two lines at the end:

Team Foundation Server Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

Visual Studio Team Services Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

In the "Features" section, table "Kanban Principles Make Process Policies Explicit Implement Feedback Loops Improve Collaboratively, Evolve Experimentally" please add two lines at the end:

Team Foundation Server Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Visual Studio Team Services Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

In the "Integration features" section, please add two lines at the end:

Team Foundation Server Yes No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No

Visual Studio Team Services Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes

Also, please use these internal URLs for each instance of the product names:

When the link text is "Team Foundation Server": ^[1]

When the link text is "Visual Studio Team Services": ^[2]

Pat MSFT (talk) 20:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done @Pat MSFT: No sources were provided to verify the claims. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 18:24, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another open source app to add: Wekan. I don't know all the the details and how it stacks up, or I would have added it myself. Fnordware (talk) 19:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the unsourced entries for "non-notable" software entries (by Wikipedia's standards). Wikipedia articles are not supposed to be indiscriminate product lists (

I don't think this will be controversial, but it could be. Does anyone object to merging this page to

In agreement, as there are un-sourced deleted wikilinks now. Better serve the purpose there.Light2021 (talk) 06:15, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, but as noted below there is really not that much to merge (unsourced content should not be merged imo). This whole "comparison" fails

WP:V: it's unclear how and with which sources the original SPA-author created this data (if the data was taken from another publication, it would be a copyright violation). Anyway, converting this to a redirect is easily reverted if anyone objects later (old information will be preserved in the edit history). And sourced significant facts could always be added in the main article(s) - so no possible content is irretrievably lost. Suggestion: Wait a few more days for additional input from other editors, then change this page to a redirect if noone objects. GermanJoe (talk) 17:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

With no opposing views in 3 weeks, I have redirected the page to

WP:PROMO as spam magnet to promote non-notable products. GermanJoe (talk) 03:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

There are only 2 entries left here. No point for a separate article. Light2021 (talk) 06:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]