Talk:Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

International relations High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization Preparatory Commission with this edit on 9 April 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

How about someone adding a reference to the IMS detection of both the 2006 and 2009 tests? NPguy (talk) 13:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article covers a future organization (CBTBO) and its preparatory commission. The info on the prep commission is currently hard to place (e.g. an infobox org of the CBTBO would be virtually empty, whereas such a box for the prep. commission would not be appropriate on this page. With the prospect of a (very) long period in which the prep org will exist and the CBTBO will not exist (requires not much chrystal balling: pakistan, india, israel, US and north korea all have to ratify!) teh prep. comm needs an article of its own in which we can focus clearly on the activities performed... L.tak (talk) 12:04, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great to have a section talking about who is financial funding this organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.5.235 (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]