Talk:Consecrated life

Older comments

I've converted some of the references from the text into footnotes and added hyperlinks to the Code of Canon Law itself. I think having the references as footnotes will help to prevent the article being mistakenly flagged up as being original research —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethelthryth679 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consecrated Life: hermits in the Roman Catholic Church

Someone added quotations from the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

1) I do not consider it appropriate to include these quotations in a general article on the Consecrated Life. If such extensive quotations from the Catechism ought to be given in Wikipedia, their place is in the article on hermits. But since apart from taking up space no harm is done by leaving them in here, I am leaving the decision whether to delete the quotations from the Catechism to later editors.

2) A more important point: The undoubtedly interesting comments from the Catechism must not detract from the fact that in the Roman Catholic Church it is the Code of Canon Law 1983 that is normative, not the Catechism, which is merely a kind of commentary (see the Apostolic Constitution "Fidei Depositum" on the purpose of the Catechism). Therefore I had previously provided the text of canon 603 concerning consecrated hermits and moved the quotations from the Catechism added by someone else to a position further down. But on re-visiting the article today I found that a subsequent editor deleted the text of canon 603 and in its place moved back the quotations from the Catechism. I have now restored the text of canon 603 to the appropriate place in the article (and – again out of consideration for the other editor's apparently strong interest in the quotations from the Catechism – have not deleted them but relegated them once more to a posterior position).

11:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Merge?

Someone has proposed merging this article with

Consecrated life (Catholic Church). I agree. Both article are about consecrated life as understood and regulated by the Catholic Church. I don't think "consecrated life" is used as a technical term outside the Catholic Church. I therefore think the merged article should bear the simple title "Consecrated life". Esoglou (talk) 19:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The proposal was made by User:Teukros. Esoglou (talk) 07:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim62sch (talk • contribs)

I have gone ahead and performed the merge. Esoglou (talk) 19:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Graphical aid (Intricate topics)

May someone make an Euler diagram (or some other kind of graphical aid), to unravel the intricate relationships among the related topics: religious institute, secolar istitute, society of apostolic life, religious orders, religious congregations and so on? --5.170.71.110 (talk) 10:03, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The outline in

talk) 19:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Consecrated life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Consecrated life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic POV

Is Consecrated life related only to Catholic church?! --79.50.143.229 (talk) 15:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is on behalf of the state of life in the catholic church which is called consecreated life, see first sentence.--Medusahead (talk) 09:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Broadening the scope of the article

@Elizium23: @Omnipaedista: @Marcocapelle: Hello again. I feel the article could be broadened by including monasterial traditions of other Churches. However, we could also keep it centered on the Catholic Church as @Epistulae ad Familiares: and @Medusahead: have proposed. What do you think? Veverve (talk) 06:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it known as "consecrated life" in other traditions or is it by another name? If we expand the scope, we need to consider a name that will be inclusive. I can see good rationale for adding e.g. Anglican and Lutheran religious institutes. Elizium23 (talk) 06:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If there is wp content about e.g. Anglican and Lutheran religious institutes already, then adding links in the "see also" section may suffice. See also
Taize by the way. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The term "consecrated life" is never used in the Eastern Orthodox Church. It is used in the Church of England though (see 1). I am not so familiar with other traditions. --Omnipaedista (talk) 09:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As the introduction says: "Consecrated life is a state of life in the Catholic Church…" (italics in the citation are mine). Among other arguments, Consecrated life is also used as a legal term. (It isn't intended to say that other churches have no dedicated forms of followership, but they do not use the term in that way, just as little as the Orthodox churches. No one would even bother to say they have no monasterial tradition.) --Medusahead (talk) 09:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christian monasticism already exists, so the only candidates to expand the page are apparently Anglicans. Veverve (talk) 16:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would be interested to know if there are forms of consecrated life in other traditions which are not monasticism. It would seem that in Eastern Orthodoxy it's monasticism or nothing. Clearly if "Call the Midwife" is to be believed, there are/were Anglican sisters in apostolates that were not cloistered. And so forth. Elizium23 (talk) 19:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, does everyone agree to expand the scope of the article? Veverve (talk) 12:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for joining this discussion late. Similar to

WP:OVERLAP

with existing articles.

As I understand, the main reason why this topic exists on its own within the Catholic Church separate from

WP:RELAR

. This cannot necessarily be said of analogous situations in non-Catholic contexts.

If the Single Consecrated Life network has merited significant coverage, it can probably be given its own article, but I do not think it is necessarily that huge a topic that it would have to displace the current article, which unambiguously remains the

WP:PRIMARYTOPIC that most readers would be looking for. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 07:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Requested move 27 January 2021

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. After much-extended time for discussion, there is no consensus for a move at this time. BD2412 T 06:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PRECISION and to avoid people mistakenly add information about this state in other churches. Veverve (talk) 08:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. Jack Frost (talk) 10:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Support this is a generic and broad term, which article content is not. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - As my argument above. This would become a
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of this term. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 07:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Oppose per Epistulae ad Familiares, the Catholic concept is the primary topic. Vpab15 (talk) 20:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.