Talk:Criticism of pandeism

	This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Religion ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Epistemology#Irrationalism|irrationalism]] The anchor (#Irrationalism) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The place to discuss this draft. Hyperbolick (talk) 18:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a draft, so things in here now might not be in the article when done.

This review criticizes an anthology about pandeism for not talking much about love.[1] I think there is something to this, but it would need more sources before any inclusion in the article.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 00:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a very good find —- thank you. Hyperbolick (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because It has been here since before the website that copies it, so it is the website which is the copyvio. --Hyperbolick (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dropping here: [2] Hyperbolick (talk) 08:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The 'Olson' here is Alan M. Olson. Hyperbolick (talk) 09:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the whole quote.

According to [Alan M.] Olson, Jaspers's perception of ciphers stresses the centrality of the individual experiencing the constitution of the symbol and activity involved in interpreting it, compared with Christian theology, which grants a different weight to the individual and to the symbolic aspects of religion. In his opinion, the fear that pandeism or the tendency to reduce faith into the external means by which it is obtained would eventually lead to the viewing of these means as having purely subjective, and also mutable, validity, was behind the Catholic church's emphasis on the objective truth of the symbols themselves in relation to the individual religious experience.

- Ronny Miron, Karl Jaspers: From Selfhood to Being (Rodopi 2012), p. 249, ISBN 9042035315.

Knujon Mapson (December 29, 2022). "Pandeism… author answers misconceptions". Register Publications.

Adrienne Greene (October 30, 2018). "Ask… Pastor: The universe is not God; God made the universe" (PDF). Register Publications.

Looking on this section, takes one single mention by one single author that Hegel was a Pandeist, and stretches that around unrelated analyses of Hegelian dialectics, from sources making no mention at all of pandeism. Perhaps better used on another page. Hyperbolick (talk) 13:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]