Talk:Dawndraco

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance Dawndraco is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Palaeontology: Pterosaurs Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Pterosaurs task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Seems this genus was shot down by a multi-authored paper[1], but do we then also merge

I think we should merge Dawndraco into Geosternbergia, and leave the latter be for now. They are definitely two distinct species whether or not they are considered the same genus, so it couldn't hurt to have a separate article. Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree... It seemed kind of inevitable from the start this would happen... FunkMonk (talk) 11:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the images can be used under CC By 4.0?--MWAK (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, paper is open access and CC licensed! Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added a photo of the specimen to the Geosternbergia article. Time to redirect this one? FunkMonk (talk) 22:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]