Talk:Disengagement theory
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dh05090.
Above undated message substituted from talk) 19:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)]
Requested move 8 September 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move — Amakuru (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
talk • mail) 14:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
]
- Oppose for now per WP:DAB; we do not use unnecessary disambiguation. Switch to support if there is some non-aging-related disengagement theory about which we could have an article and for which readers might be looking. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 02:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support
Is it too late to support the move?...--Monochrome_Monitor 19:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)