Talk:Dogs of War! (film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 8 February 2021
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (-- Calidum 15:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)]
Dogs of War (film), on the other hand, does redirect here to Dogs of War! (film), which is not to be confused with The Dogs of War (film). — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
]
- Oppose. The exclamation mark is just not enough of a disambiguator. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)]
- Oppose. The exclamation mark is not enough of a disambiguator. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support per WP:SMALLDETAILS similar to the Airplane example, none of the other topics indicate that they are called "Dogs of War!" with the exclamation mark. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)]
- Yes but as WP:SMALLDETAILS makes clear Airplane! is a super-exception. Dogs of War! is a 1923 silent short, we have many small details articles which aren't Airplane!. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)]
- Yes but as
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.