Talk:Dongo conflict

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dongo conflict article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Africa: DRC Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Democratic Republic of the Congo portal This article is supported by WikiProject Democratic Republic of the Congo (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: African

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force

Distance to ROC border

By 5 November 2009 at least 16,000 civilians have fled to neighbouring Republic of Congo (ROC).

According to the map of Dungu it is very distant (1000 km?) from the ROC border so this sentence is a bit dubious. --Vs1969 (talk) 07:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Found the source of the problem: the link in the article pointed to the wrong Dungu (in different province) so I've removed it.--Vs1969 (talk) 07:31, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think it should be Dongo (2°42′N 18°24′E / 2.700°N 18.400°E) and not Dungu. Physchim62 (talk) 12:50, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dongo conflict. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100207225806/http://www.aparecordc.org:80/forum/portal.php?pid=18 to http://www.aparecordc.org/forum/portal.php?pid=18
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.aparecordc.org/forum/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Death Count

How are 168,000 people displaced when only 100 combatants have been killed? That's a 1680:1 ratio. That's impossible.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Dongo conflict. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]