Talk:DotCMS

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Community/Social Networking sections

There is no reason to remove entire sections of content when edits will suffice. That's both unnecessary and supremely unhelpful. Community growth and development is historically relevant to the evolution of the environment surrounding the software. For example, Drupal has it's own Community section, as does Joomla and many others. Thequicksilver (talk) 02:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you have third party reliable sources dicussing the community section it is not need and is advertising the product. 16x9 (talk) 13:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Social networking links

Links to social networking groups were reinstated due to their relevance in showing an active community and as examples of outreach. Thequicksilver (talk) 01:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Request Removed

Removed the deletion request after adding in a couple sources, images, editing, cross linking, and expanding. If the Cascade Server entry passes, then the dotCMS entry should absolutely stay. dotCMS is an increasingly widely used system for enterprise level content management, especially in higher education. Thequicksilver (talk) 15:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Change log

I don't think the changelog information is really needed in this article.

talk) 08:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DotCMS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120421032259/http://www.packtpub.com:80/article/best-other-open-source-cms-award-final-dotcms to http://www.packtpub.com/article/best-other-open-source-cms-award-final-dotcms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]