Talk:Dryton and Apollonia archive

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ancient Egypt This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list: edit history watch purge Needed articles. We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have. Cleanup. To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates? Standardize the Chronology. A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563) Stub sorting Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . . Data sorting. This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

1. This article should be organized into sections and should more closely follow Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style. - JNB 21:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2. As noted by some people not in RomanCiv, the importance of the subject needs to be clarified.
   1. Why do we care about Dryton?
   2. What do the articles reveal?
3. Links to other Wikipedia entries must be included (it also makes less work for you because some information can be found on the links and need not be repeated).
4. The article should be better organized and sections should be given titles
5. Sources:
   1. Don't we need 3?
   2. Primary source?

JNB 22:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. This article needs to be properly formatted and broken down into a clearly organized format.
2. The present location of the original archival documents should also be indicated.
3. Also, if there are any images relevant to the archive, that would help with the overall attractiveness of the page. -- User: Sbatra86

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070527144516/http://www.paulyonline.brill.nl:80/ to http://paulyonline.brill.nl/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]