Talk:Dynamite (BTS song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Update RIAJ in Table

Dynamite is certified "Platinum" (250,000 downloads) for "single digital certifications" in RIAJ (2021年2月). Someone kindly update it in the Certifications Table because I am confused what to do with its "Cumulative sales" archive list. Facts Spiller (talk) 16:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done @Facts Spiller: since no one has updated it since the certs were released I did it. Muhandes can you please check whether I've correctly updated the Japan certification or not? -- Carlobunnie (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Carlobunnie: The template supports one of two modes, it either adds the certified amount, or you can use |salesamount= with a number from another source. It does not support both at once, and using it this way breaks the internals. I see some editors abusing it this way, but this is not how it is supposed to work. If people think this is a required feature, discuss it at Template talk:Certification Table Entry. --Muhandes (talk) 20:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Muhandes: I only copied what I saw another editor do in a previous edit (I assumed it was acceptable because no one corrected their changes) so thank you for the fixes and clarifying. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The key of the song is not C# minor

The song is in E major. It is obviously not a melancholy, minor keyed song. The first chord is C# minor but the tonic is E major. I don't know the best way to fix this on such an in-depth article so hopefully someone else can take a look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.11.152 (talkcontribs)

The source provided says "Original Published Key: C# Minor". Can you provide a
original research, and cannot be included in the article. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 20:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Key

I’m pretty sure the song is in E major, not C# minor. --121.221.134.214 (talk) 06:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the above section (#The key of the song is not C# minor). Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 18:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danuri playing the song

@Carlobunnie what's wrong with my edit?? Chinakpradhan (talk) 19:30, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits aren't constructive. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 19:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why it added a new thing a probe transmitting BTS dynamite song to us.@Btspurplegalaxy Chinakpradhan (talk) 02:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how the edits were not constructive, but the content you added probably belongs under a new "Legacy" header. Gamowebbed (talk) 12:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gamowebbed so am i allowed to add my edits again. its like Adidas Al Rihla#Trip to Space. Chinakpradhan (talk) 12:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
if you allow @Gamowebbed i can just explain it in one small line under that legacy or critical reception. Chinakpradhan (talk) 12:41, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
this news is also as important as content of Voyager Golden Record @Gamowebbed. Chinakpradhan (talk) 12:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Same thoughts as Carlobunnie and Btspurplegalaxy, the content imo isn't noteworthy enough to be included here nor do I think it's important and is also out of place. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:04, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BTW Nothing wrong with the content, see the legacy section here: The Final Countdown (song) Gamowebbed (talk) 15:21, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try add it in for you in a way that fits with the article, let me know what you think. Gamowebbed (talk) 15:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 19:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  • Sorry for the delay.
  • "band's first song fully recorded in English" maybe "band's first entirely English-language song"?
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • "and takes influence from" to "and is influenced by"?
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • "large amounts of commercial success" to "considerable commercial success" or just "commercial success"
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • "which the members" specify that it's the members of BTS.
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • 'which is "energetic' to 'which was "energetic'
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • "more PG friendly" I don't think "PG friendly" is a phrase
The phrase 'PG friendly' isn't standard. How would you like me to handle it? Should I remove it or replace it with something else?Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Link Suga at first mention.
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • "including, King" Comma isn't necessary.
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • "each member gets" to "each member [of BTS] gets"
  • 'chorus as an "earworm"' The "as" is unnecessary.
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • The Reception section seems excessively positive; the one starred review included seems middling, but there's no discussion in the text of any aspects of the song that reviewers didn't like.
  • "in just under 27 days of its exceeding the former milestone" Just mention the days after release, doing mental math here is confusing.
I just put " in under 27 days" and removed the rest of the sentence to keep it simple. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • "800–900 million views" to 800 and 900 million views"
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • "with two days of tracking" What's this mean?
It means two days of the sales that were tracked. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • "Japan besides" to "Japan after"
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • "by more than a 2.2x multiple" to "by a factor of more than 2.2"
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • "sold an additional 10,500 copies—2,748% increase—" Over what time period and an increase compared to when?
  • "US, but their first" to "US and their first"
Done Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • The world records are dubiously notable; Guinness is known for selling world records by making up random niche nonsense like "Most viewed YouTube music video in 24 hours by a K-pop group", and that looks like exactly what's here. World records also aren't accolades
  • Is the Dynamite cover really eligible for PD? The stylizing seems to be more than simple geometry to me.
It had been previously nominated for deletion but was kept. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 6:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Other image is properly used and licensed.
  • Refs are properly formatted.
  • AGF-ing on non-English refs.
  • Spot-checks: Sources verified all claims made unless noted otherwise.
    • Zornosa, Laura (August 21, 2020). "K-pop's BTS does it again, shattering records with all-English 'Dynamite'". Los Angeles Times.
    • Jenkins, Craig (August 24, 2020). "BTS Is Way Ahead of Us". Vulture.
    • Dodson, P. Claire (August 21, 2020). "BTS Releases 'Dynamite,' a Disco-Pop Boost for Hard Times". Teen Vogue.
    • Bailey, Alyssa (August 21, 2020). "BTS' 'Dynamite' Lyrics Bring Much-Needed Joy To This Rough Year". Elle.
    • Lee, Jae-lim (November 3, 2020). "BTS's 'Dynamite' reached No. 9 on Billboard's Pop Songs radio chart". Korea JoongAng Daily.
    • Teh, Cheryl (March 12, 2021). "BTS will make history when they perform at the Grammys. Whether they take home an award or not, they've already won". Insider.com. Link's broken.
    • "The Best Songs Of 2020". Uproxx.
    • McIntyre, Hugh (April 6, 2021). "BTS's 'Dynamite' Is Now The Longest-Running Hot 100 Hit By A Korean Act". Forbes. Unreliable source, see
      WP:FORBESCON
      .
    • All the Forbes sources are by "Senior Contributors" and need to be replaced since they receive no editorial oversight.
  • Nominator has indicated that they will not be responding to comments, will be failing. AryKun (talk) 14:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If the nominator isn't willing to proceed, I can take their place and address the issues at hand. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 05:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I've already failed it, but you can address the comments and renominate if you want. AryKun (talk) 19:38, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article
review progress box
WP:CV
()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4.
free or tagged images
()
6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked
are unassessed