Talk:Ecoregions of Zambia

	Ecoregions of Zambia was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 2, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Africa: Zambia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Zambia (assessed as Top-importance). Ecoregions Low‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Ecoregions, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of ecoregions. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on these topics. See WikiProject Ecoregions and Wikipedia:FAQ/Contributing.EcoregionsWikipedia:WikiProject EcoregionsTemplate:WikiProject EcoregionsEcoregions articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article failed

:

1. Well written?:

seealso

}} link under the heading. Also, the size of many of the headings is off or non-sensical. Using one level headers (=Title=) is not a generally necessary practice for section headings. Use two level headers, third level, and then fourth level in succession. Using level ones and then jumping to level four or five is not okay.

2. Factually accurate?:

reliable

and relevant source material. Please remedy the referencing before choosing to renominate.

3. Broad in coverage?: Broad in coverage, and stays on topic.

4. Neutral point of view?: Fair representation for all significant points of view.

5. Article stability? No edit wars, etc.

6. Images?:

WP:MOS#Images

, in that its sole image is not used as the lead image (situated to the right as encouraged by the guidelines).

Overall, this article has a large amount of work to be completed before it meets the

. As the work required is extensive, a hold is not appropriate. Please keep up the hard work!

When these issues are addressed, the article can be

]

Accusation, No Proof

"Bush fires range across most of the country in the later dry season, escaping from "chitemene cultivation" and caused by villagers burning off crop residue or hunting, as well as by lightning strikes." Source? 83.84.100.133 (talk) 19:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]