Talk:Ekeberg Line

Ekeberg Line has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 6, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Trains: Streetcars Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 4, 2011

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Ekeberg Line.

Factual error?

In the second last paragraph in "Threat of closure and renewal" where the article discusses the lack of suitable material after the removal of the Gullfisk in 1976, the article states "Instead, used SM91 trams from the Gothenburg Tramway were put into service."

I am unsure whether this is correct, because the SM91 were delivered to Oslo in the early 1990s (although of course, the SM91/M25 trams are much older than that). I wonder if the article are referring to the MBG trams [1], which were also imported second-hand from Sweden. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:53, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that could very well be true. I think the source used the term "Göteborgtrikkene" or "Svensketrikkene" or something like that, and I just made an erroneous assumption of which one they were referring to. The book is back at the library, so I can't really double check. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Ekeberg Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article423126.ece
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.noblad.no/nyheter/vil-forlenge-trikken-fra-ljabru-til-hauketo-1.5800041
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article1972873.ece
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ostkantavisa.no/nyheter/vil-ha-trikke-ring-rundt-gamlebyen-1.5713381
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140314040054/https://ruter.no/trafikkflyt/endringer/ekebergbanen-oppgraderes/ to https://ruter.no/trafikkflyt/endringer/ekebergbanen-oppgraderes/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]