Talk:Emaar Properties

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Untitled

Mohamed Elabaar, studied Accounting in the United States. After graduation he worked in The Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates in Abu Dhabi. The government of Dubai had interest in Al Abaar and recruited him to manage their porperties in Singapore. After his success in Singapore he went back to Dubai to work in Emaar.—The preceding

unsigned comment was added by Alromaithi (talkcontribs
) .

Fair use rationale for Image:The New Emaar Logo.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it just me or is it strange that Emaar and Nakheel has the same revenue, operating income and net income? Can someone check their real revenue? Charlie Nisser 18:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]



One Giant Advertisment

This whole article is practically an add which describes beautifully to us all of the projects underway. This is better than the Emaar website.

58.167.94.253 08:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Michael[reply]

I completely agree, the projects being undertaking are being spruiked. 123MFL 09:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've attempted to remove a lot of unnecessary adjectives and other bits which made the article seem like it was just an advert written by the company themselves (who would ever think that?!). However the article still needs a lot of work - the sections on current developments are extremely bloated and need to be cut down. Please someone be bold and sort out this article. Mushintalk 03:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]



I agree, I guess not all projects abroad should have a description. A better option is to just leave the projects in a list form. Certain projects which are notably considered huge should only be linked such as burj dubai (which already got an article link on wiki). --Moo7a 10:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Compare with ATKINS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WS_Atkins_PLC To get my point. --Moo7a 11:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I could hardly call this article a giant advertisement in its current form. The section about stock market performance and below sounded more like destructive conspiracy theories directed at the company and its owner than any form of advertising. This silly warning should be removed.

Other than that the whole article needs cleaning up. Agree with Moo7as points.


Santiago7 19:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emaar Billboard.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Emaar Billboard.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is
    non-free
    then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
    fair use rationale
    then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Emaar Billboard.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --

talk) 19:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

sombody would like to asking the location map — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.201.48.27 (talk) 11:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's better...

This article still needs a lot of sources. The flow is better and cleaner. I added the Headlines section. I'm shocked at the numerous references to corruption! I also couldn't find much information on the various projects. I can't figure out if some of these have completed or just plain failed. That would be helpful I think. --Kobuu (talk) 18:57, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Emaar Properties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Emaar Properties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Work Culture

Worth adding this topic