Talk:Emo revival

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Music/Music genres task force Post-hardcore Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Post-hardcore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of post-hardcore and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Post-hardcoreWikipedia:WikiProject Post-hardcoreTemplate:WikiProject Post-hardcorePost-hardcore articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.theskinny.co.uk/music/opinion/dont-call-it-a-revival-emo-2016

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 9 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jordywalsh (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jordywalsh (talk) 19:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Made a few changes to this page to flesh it out a bit and bring it up to date:

• Added some lines about the revival-era revelations of emo bands' sexual assault and about the broader conversation within the subculture related to misogyny
• Removed a line about two more recent bands to replace with a bigger subsection about FIfth-wave emo. Includes sources alluding to its emergence, aesthetic continuation/deviation from revival, cultural focus on better inclusion, and list of new bands. Jordywalsh (talk) 00:07, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also broke screamo revival and term controversy off into their own sections for clarity of reading. Jordywalsh (talk) 00:07, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]